Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The honest answer is likely that he liked numbers. Not many people enjoy genuine retirement. But he probably shouldn't have gone all in. :)



The article says that the spread peaked at 17 times the usual.

He was probably accounting for some risk and a $20M silly bets times 17 times leverage wiped the whole fortune.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: