Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Google themselves has actually built very few successful products outside of search. Half of what they build internally they kill and the other half is acquisitions, many of which they also kill.

Sometimes I even wonder about things like GSuite. When does the 2-year sunset period start?




RIP Songza. I will never forgive them for acquiring and ruining that service.


God I listened to Songza every single day for hours. I walked out the day they got acquired.

Ads everywhere, google showing things in your face. Nop!


$5/month per user is a pretty good return and it keeps those users/businesses from an expanded Microsoft footprint. I think (hope?) That G suite will be the exception.


Gmail, Chrome, Play, Maps seem pretty successful to me.


Maps was significantly enhanced thorough a bought company: Keyhole.

https://googlepress.blogspot.com/2005/04/google-maps-and-key...

Intermediated by the CIA;

https://pando.com/2015/07/01/cia-foia-google-keyhole/


And Chrome was based (and later forked off) on Webkit, after Apple had already done the hard work (and KHTML laid the groundwork).


Good point.


The above poster said few, not zero.

Google has killed off dozens upon dozens more officially launched projects.


the four listed are the biggest products in the world in their space. the first three would be multi billion dollar companies outside of Google.

not to mention Search itself, Docs has become a fantastic product as has Photos. of course they have killed hundreds of potentially great projects (RIP Reader) but give the company their due - they know how to build products.


>the first three would be multi billion dollar companies outside of Google

Gmail got popular because it's free (and had large space for a free client). If it wasn't to be outside of Google, it would make an insignificant amount of money through ads, or started to charge (in which case users would flee).

Ditto for Chrome. There are 4-5 free browsers, nobody would use a browser that's not free (a required for it to be a multi-billion dollar company). At best they'd sell their search bar default setting, like FF does, which is less than a billion IIRC.


Gmail would not be a multi-billion dollar company. It doesn't make money (remember they don't target ads on email content anymore). You'd have to roll in Google apps for business to get to the money making part.

Chrome definitely isn't a multi-billion dollar company. There is no revenue stream there. Firefox only exists by selling the search bar and being a non-profit.


I think that it's pretty obvious that products like chrome are not designed to make money. They are simply designed to enable control of the platform.


Context, please? OP reacted to a specific comment in this thread.


> Docs has become a fantastic product as has Photos.

Didnt the acquire companies which eventually became docs and photos?


    "the first three would be multi billion dollar companies
    outside of Google"
I think this is the problem. Google does not care about products smaller than that. They will happily shut down a product because it's too small, even though it would be a reasonably successful business on its own.

However, "reasonably successful" is not good enough for them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: