>Wouldn't it be charitable to assume that they're putting forward a sub-optimal version of their argument, ie not the strongest version? (Thus, their argument could be made stronger.)
What the parent means is that we should treat what they say as if they meant the "strongest possible version".
So, parent doesn't mean "assume what they said was the strongest possible version" but "assume the strongest possible version of what they said".
What the parent means is that we should treat what they say as if they meant the "strongest possible version".
So, parent doesn't mean "assume what they said was the strongest possible version" but "assume the strongest possible version of what they said".