Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You're probably right, but do you not agree that declaring PRISM illegal would be a helpful step?



I believe he's trying to say that it's just impossible. In movies heroes uncover government conspiracies and culprits get handcuffed. In real world nothing happened. Snowden is now a cultural reference for comedy:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6663582/


In the real world, whistleblowers and their lawyers get prosecuted for revealing illegal activities the government was conducting:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-28/australian-spys-lawyer...


In the real world, heroes get handcuffed - see the excellent documentary about US government whistleblowers Silenced (2014)


Yes but what are the chances of that happening when it's a case involving a man accused of supporting terrorists? This is exactly the purpose of the program, so there won't be much of an argument there. If anything this will set a precedent and cement over the program's 'usefulness'.

The question is why did they have to wait for the program to actually catch someone supporting terrorism before taking it to court?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: