Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> therefore are able to split Nginx arbitrarily into the Nginx "core" vs. Nginx Plus.

Anyone can split the Nginx core codebase arbitrarily into A and A Plus.

"Nginx" is trademarked, just as "Redis" trademarked, but I don't think we're talking about trademarks. I think we're talking about code, and the BSD open source code bases can -- in theory -- be changed and evolved by literally anyone.

---

> Those distributions don't own Linux.

With such permissive OSS licenses, there is little of the traditional concept to the word "own".

> Similarly, Ubuntu and RHEL are corporately-developed Linux distributions.

Hypothetically, suppose Ubuntu was responsible for over 90% of Linux development, and Ubuntu maintained extensive non-OSS additions to Linux.

Or suppose CloudBees was responsible for over 90% of Jenkins development, and CloudBees maintained extensive non-OSS additions to Jenkins.

Then yes, in both cases I would absolutely call it open-core.

I don't think that's a dirty word; it simple describes the realities of the situation.

You seem to be making a distinction with a difference.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: