Ahh, yes. Always useful to continuously cherry-pick or alter definitions to tailor words that have an objectively negative moral implication to apply to exactly the standards you want.
Just because some publications use the word in that way does not mean the definition of the word should be shifted.
I’m sorry but this is a pointedly stupid comment. I’m doing the exact opposite of cherry-picking - I’m saying the definition is much broader than the inaccurately narrow one posted.
Just because some publications use the word in that way does not mean the definition of the word should be shifted.