On: Programming in the Adult Entertainment Industry Is...

[krapp]

>You'd think porn companies would charge with sensible names?

If they're doing legal business, why should they?

[wodenokoto → krapp]

For the same reason porn magazine aren't delivered in see-through plastic like other magazines and instead are delivered in white envelopes.

[mrweasel → wodenokoto]

I don't know where you live, but porn magazines are in see-through plastic, just like other magazines. They're just on the top shelf, that's all.

[wodenokoto → mrweasel]

Not when you subscribe to them and they arrive in your mailbox!

[teekert → krapp]

I think margins are going down and there are plenty of stories of women being completely stuck in a world they don't want to be in, some of them actually struggling with mental issues. Sure, some probably like it but I can understand that companies prefer not to be associated with a world that seemingly contains a lot of misery. There are plenty of documentaries about the industry, they don't paint a rosy picture.

[lagadu → teekert]

> I can understand that companies prefer not to be associated with a world that seemingly contains a lot of misery.

They're already in the pharma and health business.

[teekert → lagadu]

I understand the down voting and I also understand your response. But wouldn't it be nice if there were fair-trade porn sites? Where we know people are treated an paid well? It's insane that there is so much for free while there is so much work involved.

[lagadu → teekert]

I completely agree, I recall running into a couple here and there but the only one I know from memory that attempts that is kink.com (or so they say).

[krapp → teekert]

Fair enough, but porn companies billing under another name wouldn't change any of that.

[maxerickson → krapp]

Uh, for business reasons?

That is, to simplify the process of doing business.

(I don't understand what other meaning you'd get from the other post)