> If that quote attributed to Fred Jelineck ("Every time I fire a linguist, the performance of the speech recognizer goes up") is right, they should have negative linguists.
That's a really, really, really stupid quote that pushes the increasingly popular world view that experts only drag the world down on every subject.
Linguists' contribution is unrelated to performance, positive or negative. Performance is the job of computer scientists designing architecture and of skilled programmers doing smart implementations of architecture.
The performance would probably go up if the company fired all presidents/vice presidents/CFOs etc., too (giving implementors free reign, unconstrained by costs and schedules), but the company would probably go under.
Every specialist has their own role to play. Thinking that subject domain expertise is a negative is indefensible.
Just to add my two cents (I work for Mozilla on Common Voice): without help from linguists, Common Voice would have made some very different and very bad decisions about all sorts of things like: accents, dialect segmentation, corpus curation, licensing, and many other things. Linguistics were absolutely instrumental. We tried to thank some of them at the end of our blog post:
https://medium.com/mozilla-open-innovation/more-common-voice...
I think you are misinterpreting the quote. He meant that experts (computational linguists and statisticians) had a firmer grasp of the task of inference in language than linguists, who tend to care more about formal structure (i.e. Chomsky's competence/performance distinction) and are less aware of problems like overfitting. If anything, it's stressing the importance of domain expertise, just suggesting that who those experts are may be nonobvious.
That's a really, really, really stupid quote that pushes the increasingly popular world view that experts only drag the world down on every subject.
Linguists' contribution is unrelated to performance, positive or negative. Performance is the job of computer scientists designing architecture and of skilled programmers doing smart implementations of architecture.
The performance would probably go up if the company fired all presidents/vice presidents/CFOs etc., too (giving implementors free reign, unconstrained by costs and schedules), but the company would probably go under.
Every specialist has their own role to play. Thinking that subject domain expertise is a negative is indefensible.