apologies for the edits; in attempting better clarity I am achieving the opposite.
> The whole concept isn't good even if the tech was perfect -- precisely because of scale -- and must be protested until the whole idea is let go of.
I don't disagree with this. my questions are not political in nature, I was simply curious if the tech had approached or surpassed the accuracy of super-recognizers.
> The whole concept isn't good even if the tech was perfect -- precisely because of scale -- and must be protested until the whole idea is let go of.
I don't disagree with this. my questions are not political in nature, I was simply curious if the tech had approached or surpassed the accuracy of super-recognizers.