> The victims being criminals makes the "is it a bad thing?" question all-but-irrelevant. I would have thought that obvious.
So summary execution of every criminal ever would be fine?
I really don't follow your reasoning here. You seem to hold that criminals are essentially not human, and not due any consideration. If so, I don't see us coming to a resolution.
So summary execution of every criminal ever would be fine?
I really don't follow your reasoning here. You seem to hold that criminals are essentially not human, and not due any consideration. If so, I don't see us coming to a resolution.