As an economics major, it's very clear to me who in this thread has received an education in economics going beyond the freshman level, and who has not. The giveaway tell is that, much like climate change deniers or anti-vaxxers, the latter focus on questioning the fundamental methodologies and paradigms of this field without the contextual knowledge to understand why they came to be established through overwhelming consensus in the first place. Such idle complaints do not constitute valid criticism or discourse, but only ignorance.
Might you give us your own input then? It would be more useful to those who have not received an education in economics going beyond the freshman level, as the others apparently don't need your input.
