> I was in my 30s and holding a steady job as a programmer with big corporate. Then I decided to take a small sabbatical. Before I knew it, several years had passed
Boy does that sound familiar. I’m fine financially, but mainly due to luck. Tried looking for work before family medical issues took higher priority, but if getting a new job had been as easy as I had expected before the sabbatical, I wouldn’t have been available to help the family.
I still don’t know how much of my problem was down to me vs how much was down to looking in Berlin when all of my previous work had been in the UK.
I suspect this scenario is unique to the high tech software/hradware/IT industry due to the pace at which workers are expected to work at in this industry. With age related decline in efficiency, the only option available to you is to look for more managerial or organizational roles which are at higher levels in the jobs pyramid and hence fewer in number. In other industries, which have been around a lot longer than the 40-50 year old IT industry, I suspect this is not as much of a problem because their pacing issues are far better resolved.
That's an interesting observation.
Let's take a sport.
Say tennis.
let's take competitive tennis, played by professionals.
At the world level, tennis is both a physical and mental game where you are trying to outguess your opponent in the context of a rally.
Roger Federer, who is now 36 is a rare exception in his ability to stay on top at his age.
The sport requires intense focus, both mental and physical.
This focus does goes down beyond a certain age.
You could argus that there is a difference between physical and mental focus ...
> You could argus that there is a difference between physical and mental focus ...
Not only that, developing software is generally a "slow" task, not constant decision making in spans of milliseconds like in a "fast" sport you mentioned. If you want to compare, try a "slow" sport like golf, does your observation still hold true?
In engineering tasks you also gain a lot of productivity (at least if your metrics aren't crap, might be often a problem here) from years and decades of building up experience and knowledge. Moreover this doesn't get lost to a huge degree if you pause 1-2 years, not like physical training which goes away quickly and is hard to build up again.
I think what could play a role here is that older people may often be less focused on the job because that focus shifts to other things in life like e.g. family.
I have to say I have more than just some experience here... Quick decision times decline VERY slowly; that is to say the amount of time it takes to make the correct decision as opposed to just reacting to a situation. You are confusing the amount of strength it takes to play at the top level and still have enough in the tank to not lose focus.
FWIW I'm not talking out of my hat here, I "played" a very thought intensive sport in my younger day and was one of the top guys in the US on any given day. I still have ridiculously quick decision times and the concentration of a Monk with ADD when I drive, But there's no way my bod could compete with a my former self of 20 years ago. I'm in pretty good shape now but I'm not a World class athlete anymore.
Aging and tennis (and sports in general) reflects real, physical deteriorations that aren't in play -- at least not in the same domain -- with mental processes.
With any decline in focus it is important to see a therapist and find out if you are really suffering from depression. It is stunningly common for people to mistake the symptoms of depression for the symptoms of aging.
That's a double edged sword because the therapist you choose has a singificant role to play in your understanding of focus and it's level correlation with age. Your therapist's a bility to diagnose is stringly correlated with your ability to communicate the nature of your work. Every other thepaists you go with with your query will give you a different answer. In other words, it's a very subjective process and hence double edged. It's not cut and dried or objective like analysis, which as an engineer, you are likely good at.
Mid 20's SE here. I've known so many colleagues past 40, and they would mop the floor with me technically. The experience of being in the industry for 20 years is gold.
The only advantage we (younger people) have is energy and fewer responsibilities (take care of kids, grandsons, medical issues). But we are still reckless and have many unknowns unknowns compared to the older folk.
Boy does that sound familiar. I’m fine financially, but mainly due to luck. Tried looking for work before family medical issues took higher priority, but if getting a new job had been as easy as I had expected before the sabbatical, I wouldn’t have been available to help the family.
I still don’t know how much of my problem was down to me vs how much was down to looking in Berlin when all of my previous work had been in the UK.