Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A lot of D3's oddness comes from the fact that there isn't anything (to my knowledge) that is comparable. It does just one thing - binding data to DOM elements - does it well, and then gets out of the way.



D3 has libraries that do many other things, and TBH I feel like selection is the most "aged" part of D3. IMO modern component libraries such as React, Vue or Mithril do a much better job of maintaining a binding between data and the DOM tree. But many parts of D3 don't particularly care about how you eventually render the result.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: