Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
tedunangst
on June 11, 2018
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
PCG: a family of better random number generators
Why does the table on the website include them?
slavik81
on June 11, 2018
[–]
If you're comparing all PRNGs, there's no reason to exclude the CSPRNGs. They're fine to use for all sorts of purposes. They mostly just tend to be slow.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
