Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> This is what we call a “blind spot” — you have had success with your working style, and start to assume it’s the only effective way to do the work.

After decades in the industry, I'm comfortable that my success is repeatable (as I have done) and is the most effective way to do the work. As if there's a debate, I'm really surprised by the endless process and bad management advice circulating on the web, among the good. "This hasn't killed my company yet and I'm happy with what we have" is the refrain from small and large companies wasting time and effort (with things like scheduled reviews). Talented Managers aren't supposed to be listeners, unless you're trapped in a byzantine/hobbesian org (these emerge in different tiers).

> Reviews are important for someone with whom you don’t share a lot of built in cultural cues.

No, they aren't. They are important for you to set standards of accountability, at best...unless you really don't have power to do anything about it, which I've seen. You don't change their culture and they don't change yours, regardless of what you tell yourself. The job description and company-necessary responsibilities aren't changing based on the person. I'm not sure there's any value in going on about it, this kind of thinking is just madness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: