Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why would you need a government, even a democratic one, if you had no intention of restricting any individual's freedom?



Individuals are generally trustworthy. Groups generally act like sociopaths.

There's a difference between restricting the freedom of all individuals and restricting the freedom of some individuals.

Eventually you have to draw some lines (e.g. not letting people murder each other).


But don't laws that apply to all individuals inevitably apply only to some subset? Most people have no desire to murder others and so are basically unaffected by a law forbidding it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: