Maybe some companies have overreacted, but dismissing them feels a bit like blaming the user for bad UX.
Couldn't you argue that a law that causes a panicked overreaction was a poorly written law in at least one respect, given that laws have a communicative function?
Especially if all these complaints were raised well in advance of the passage of the law, so that the drafters had plenty of warning that several groups were struggling to understand the text?
Maybe some companies have overreacted, but dismissing them feels a bit like blaming the user for bad UX.
Couldn't you argue that a law that causes a panicked overreaction was a poorly written law in at least one respect, given that laws have a communicative function?
Especially if all these complaints were raised well in advance of the passage of the law, so that the drafters had plenty of warning that several groups were struggling to understand the text?