So the people who are suspicious of NSAs motives and actions are "tin foil hats", but your position is somehow "the reality"?
> From someone who has been following this saga
What does following mean here? Who are you? What are your credentials that somehow make your opinion more authoritative than that of others?
> Most likely due to their own internal self-conflict.
So you are just guessing? Is it at least an educated guess? If so, based on what?
> There really isn't much room for obscuring anything there.
Is there a publicly verifiable analysis by cryptographers to back this claim?
So the people who are suspicious of NSAs motives and actions are "tin foil hats", but your position is somehow "the reality"?
> From someone who has been following this saga
What does following mean here? Who are you? What are your credentials that somehow make your opinion more authoritative than that of others?
> Most likely due to their own internal self-conflict.
So you are just guessing? Is it at least an educated guess? If so, based on what?
> There really isn't much room for obscuring anything there.
Is there a publicly verifiable analysis by cryptographers to back this claim?