Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Definitely this. Better to lose a shield prototype than a fancy rover you already spent millions to hurl into space.



The article isn't 100% clear on this, but to me it reads that the actual heat shield that they were going to use in the mission broke (not a prototype). Which is still much better than the alternative (losing a multi-billion dollar project in Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly)


Yep. Much better for the heat shield to break in a test chamber on Earth and have to be rebuilt, than for it to break during Mars atmospheric reentry and end the mission.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: