Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Eclipse has for years felt like someone generalized both IBM and Java's beliefs and built an IDE.

That's good for some types of coding, but bad for others.

... then the nail in the coffin was going down the rabbit hole with plugins. The bazaar model only works if you have enough shopkeeps. (No offense intended to the gracious maintainers of Eclipse packages, but many could do with a LOT more people helping)




Actually Eclipse was a product that IBM designed in the 90' : VisualAge (I used it at that time, it was really slow on an average computer).

In the 2000 IBM renamed it "WAS" and it was its main studio for J2EE (Websphere) developpers. Some people really liked it.

Then IBM opensourced it as "Eclipse". This name was perhaps a pun on "Sun".


>Then IBM opensourced it as "Eclipse". This name was perhaps a pun on "Sun".

Yes, I had read that rumour too - that it implied the Eclipse of the Sun ...

Of course the Eclipse logo (last I checked) also implied that.


I think most people are aware where it came from. ;)


Been a Java developer since 1999 and have used everything, MS Visual J++, JBuilder, NetBeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ. Sadly I just got the "joke" :( Never put two and two together, I just thought it was a cool name...


What happened to JBuilder? I had used for a while earlier. Seemed good then. (ex-Borland fan here.) Did it get messed up in the general mess up that Borland (aka a few other corp names over the years) did to their once-good products, or was it some other reason?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: