Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

GAN is just a brilliant concept. I look forward to all the new tools to come out of this.



They didn't use GAN for this.


While I didn't read the paper in detail, there are a lot of papers in the references section about GANs. And referring back to the text that cites them makes it pretty obvious they did use GANs.


Perhaps you should read the paper in detail before arguing. Eq. 7 makes it pretty obvious there's no discriminator.


it's just a PUN guys

and yes, this is just an acronym




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: