I have in no way equivocated ethics with religion or dismissed the purpose of ethics in AI, merely questioned who will be most fit to pass judgment while claiming them as a justification, however, it's now clear to me you're a idiot from that last post so I will not engage further.
> I do not think "trained ethics experts" should fall into any equation whatsoever. There are enough of them in the middle east and deep south. We don't need them infecting the intelligent world anymore than they do already. The conversation should not be driven by an intellectual movement that is equivalent to a bunch of cavemen poking a coconut with sticks.
I'm rolling my eyes so hard. Whatever did you mean by this?
Don't give yourself too much credit, you've made no such point. You've merely called the authors morons and equated ethics and religion with cavemen.
Edit: edited moron to say idiot