Beyond things that a company would approve of, just what were these payments for? (...something beyond payments for sex, or payments not to talk about having had sex?)
Note that payments "to her" is different than saying payments "for meals" mentioned elsewhere. (obviously those would go to the restaurant, not her)
If it would make anyone feel better, there are affairs that are non sexual.
The WSJ had this on the amount:
"One person familiar with the matter said the questionable expense reports totaled no more than around $20,000."
A bit much for dinner? Do HP stockholders have a right to know what that was spent on?
Beyond things that a company would approve of, just what were these payments for? (...something beyond payments for sex, or payments not to talk about having had sex?)
Note that payments "to her" is different than saying payments "for meals" mentioned elsewhere. (obviously those would go to the restaurant, not her)
If it would make anyone feel better, there are affairs that are non sexual.
The WSJ had this on the amount: "One person familiar with the matter said the questionable expense reports totaled no more than around $20,000."
A bit much for dinner? Do HP stockholders have a right to know what that was spent on?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870330970457541...