Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Machnes cannot have an operating mode where they can kill someone.

I agree that they shouldn’t, but they certain do. Strangely we seem fairly ok with devices that kill us when we use them wrong (eg cars, power tools, weapons) but we are outraged when devices that make decisions for themselves kills us. For the victim it’s little different, but somehow it is.




I believe the difference is that the decision is taken by someone who has a conscious mental model of how he's going to be punished for killing someone.


I think it more that if someone is killed by something they control it is seen as more acceptable than them being killed by something they don’t have any control over. For example someone dying in a car crash on the way to work is not front page news. However if someone dies on the way to work when the train crashes, it is.


Car crashes vs. train crashes is because of frequency: Trains crash seldomly enough for it to be newsworthy.

When more cars are autonomous, we may also see news about fatal incidents fade into the background noise.


If that alone explains it, then the situation is even stranger. We are alarmed at an infrequent event but accept as normal that lots of people die because of cars. Not seeing the wood for the trees.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: