TLDR; convnet for joint localization, old school optimization techniques (graph coloring, etc) to put the pieces back together.
Re license, I don’t at all mind research being commercialized, but the use of “open” in the name rubs me the wrong way. Who in their right mind would work on this? At best it will become a benchmark to compare other systems against.
The FSF requires a snail mail letter for copyright assignment. I don’t know the specifics, but this suggests magical auto-assign copyright clauses may not hold up.
Personally I GPL my stuff that may be commercially valuable. It allows a community to maintain an open version and produce offshoots, while you maintain your own version with only code you wrote for licensing.
TLDR; convnet for joint localization, old school optimization techniques (graph coloring, etc) to put the pieces back together.
Re license, I don’t at all mind research being commercialized, but the use of “open” in the name rubs me the wrong way. Who in their right mind would work on this? At best it will become a benchmark to compare other systems against.
The FSF requires a snail mail letter for copyright assignment. I don’t know the specifics, but this suggests magical auto-assign copyright clauses may not hold up.
Personally I GPL my stuff that may be commercially valuable. It allows a community to maintain an open version and produce offshoots, while you maintain your own version with only code you wrote for licensing.