Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Probably worth adding (2015) to the title.



Why's that?


I for one appreciate when something that's several years old is clearly identified as such. That way I know that I should at least consider the possibility that what I'm reading, if I find it useful, is potentially out of date.


The LLVM api evolves rapidly. There is no way sample code from 2015 will compile cleanly with the latest version.


On HN, it's the convention to add the year when a story is more than a year and a bit old.


Thanks—added.


Thanks dang!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: