>I think, if there are solid reasons to believe that studies on curcumin will not turn up any useful results and then a study finds results it calls significant, the chances are that either that study is not designed very well, or its results are not significant, despite the claims of the authors.
If there are indeed "strong reasons" then the rest is a tautology.
If there are not, then making such a conclusion is bias.
If there are indeed "strong reasons" then the rest is a tautology.
If there are not, then making such a conclusion is bias.