> If this is about protecting the consumer, perhaps the consumer shouldn’t be meddling in a space that is still being developed where there are big risk factors at this point in time. Or maybe I just dont get it.
You assume consumers don't have needs and are immune to incentives, and also that people running the coins are perfectly honest, and it would never cross their mind to architect incentives in such a way, as to predictably exploit those consumers.
You assume consumers don't have needs and are immune to incentives, and also that people running the coins are perfectly honest, and it would never cross their mind to architect incentives in such a way, as to predictably exploit those consumers.
Also, what 'dmd wrote.