Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You aren't saving those $.10 per mile, you're converting them to a different operating cost per mile, with fuel, maintenance, crew, and so on. Any well thought out cost benefit analysis says 64 billion is absolutely unreasonable.

You're right that short term thinking and underinvestment in infrastructure is a problem. But you have to choose your projects intelligently: things like revamping BART and New York's MTA, and taking better care of the most-used roads and bridges are far far better uses of public money.

Part of the reason we underinvest in infrastructure is that people see these pointless multi-billion-dollar boondoggles and cry out their money is being wasted. If you really want more spending on infrastructure, give up on your dream projects and spend on things that will actually make a big difference in people's lives.




> Any well thought out cost benefit analysis says 64 billion is absolutely unreasonable.

This desperately needs the support of at least one such “well thought out” cost/benefit analysis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: