Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

exactly. The way I see it, as the average life span of a human increases the pace of life will slow to a more leisurely elven type speed. Things are a lot more complex and there is a great deal more to know than say a century or even half a century ago, it takes a bit longer now to come up to speed.



Unfortunately the basic constraints on childbearing years still (basically) stand.


When you can have children at 10 or 60 and your life expectancy is only 80 it's not really a major issue.


There was a story on Hacker News about this a while back, but here's something I found through a quick search.

Best age for childbearing remains 20-35 - Delaying risks heartbreak, say experts http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/30737.php


Yes, and I don't think it's easy for women to have children at 60 or 10, however it's still possible. Biologically it's probably optimal to have children in the 16 - 22, socially 25 - 35 is probably ideal. However, I was simply pointing out that the limits of biology are well outside the shift in optimal range we are talking about.


Men might be able to have children at 60, but it's not so easy for women.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: