It is completely within the context of what you wrote in reality. Money is taken from some people and given to other people. There is no moral difference between the mugger's threat to shoot you for not forking over and the government's threat to take your property or throw you in jail for not forking over. And the recipient/beneficiary of the theft is a thief, even if you/they are too gutless to do your/their own threatening. Maybe you are one of those idiots who actually believes in the "Social Security Trust Fund" and you get your own money back; but that belief does not make it true.
There is no moral difference between the mugger's threat to shoot you for not forking over and the government's threat to take your property or throw you in jail for not forking over.
I usually don't bother responding to this sort of tripe, but it's so easy to prove you wrong that I couldn't resist.
The difference is that, if you really feel that taxes are such an injustice, you are free to leave. Voila, end of problem. Would that I had had that option when I was robbed at gunpoint at couple years ago.
Seriously, put your money where your mouth is and light out for that splendid anarchic paradise you and your ilk dream of so fervently. No one is stopping you and you wouldn't be missed.
What's that? There's no WalMart or fire department in Mogadishu? Bummer...
There is no moral difference between the mugger's threat to shoot you for not forking over and the government's threat to take your property or throw you in jail for not forking over.
The difference is that the government's actions are based on laws, which were passed by elected representatives and thus indirectly by the public. Not "forking over" to the government is the same as not paying a debt and claiming that you didn't personally agree to contracts being actually binding.
Maybe you're one of those idiots who actually believe you can have a functioning society without rules that everyone has to adher to even if they personally don't agree with all of them, but that belief does not make it true.
There is a big difference between laws against actual crimes (mala in se) and pure redistribution, ie robbing some to pay others, which is all welfare and social security are.
Bullshit. Welfare and social security are A) a form of insurance against misfortune (which anyone can suffer) and B) the result of a consensus that a humane, civilized society should not let anyone starve, freeze or die of easily curable diseases no matter who they are.
