Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> manipulation by government for political or plain self-interest reasons counts as compromising

Some countries, e.g. the Cayman Islands or Zimbabwe, peg (or have pegged) their currency to a foreign currency [1]. There has also been discussion of rule-based monetary policy [2], where central bankers' discretion is limited. A blockchain would be a stricter form of both, amplifying their benefits as well as downsides.

TL; DR We don't understand monetary policy well enough, broadly enough, to have a set of rules everyone agrees are good. Such strictures are better than an economy being left to incompetent central bankers, or in certain limited cases (e.g. Hong Kong or Bermuda's financial proximity to much-larger economies). For general cases, or in a permanent structure such as a blockchain, however, much more work needs to be done.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_board

[2] http://www.frbsf.org/education/publications/doctor-econ/2001...




The Federal Reserve acts algorithmically. New money is only created when new loans are requested by big commercial banks, and those loans are demanded on behalf of retail loans, which are initiated in proportion with economic activity by economic actors. The only discretion involved is the interest rates on those loans, which indirectly controls people’s willingness to take out loans.


> The Federal Reserve acts algorithmically .. only discretion involved is the interest rates

I built a self driving car. The only human discretion is the steering wheel.


Interesting information. I just think that the benefits of a trustless system are such that will warrant working around any downsides -even though we're not there yet.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: