If the idea is true, then wouldn't it actually be good?
Or, I guess there may be a distinction between "it is good to, for every thing, to be skeptical of that thing" and "for every thing, it is good to be skeptical of that thing".
I consider the statement that "for every statement, it is good to be skeptical of that statement, regardless of what other statements that one is or is not skeptical of" to be doubtful.
It seems fairly clear that skepticism which is directed in a specific way can be harmful?
Or, I guess there may be a distinction between "it is good to, for every thing, to be skeptical of that thing" and "for every thing, it is good to be skeptical of that thing".
I consider the statement that "for every statement, it is good to be skeptical of that statement, regardless of what other statements that one is or is not skeptical of" to be doubtful.
It seems fairly clear that skepticism which is directed in a specific way can be harmful?