The guy is obviously clueless. Obviously. He claims that bitcoin’s value is derived from expectation of “future growth” implying that it’s not the case with literally any other investment in any other instrument be it a currency, a common stock, a commodity or a bond.
An “economist” that didn’t grasp the trivial notion that “inherent value” is a myth? Nobel prize my ass.
An “economist” that didn’t grasp the trivial notion that “inherent value” is a myth? Nobel prize my ass.