Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If you do nothing, you end up with secrets manually provisioned by logging into a machine and splatting out a configuration file. Which is a more secure solution than a turtles-problem parameter store.



You're assuming readers are managing snowflake servers, and I'm assuming they are in an containerized/autoscaling/more modern environment.

SSM wins for mine. I think you're right that the file approach wins for yours.


I'm assuming readers are just starting out, where auto-scaling and bloggable container architectures make very little sense. Configuration management is a prerequisite for those. That said, having a CM in place also makes the please-invest-in-us container ecosystem much less attractive, given that you can easily fall back to singleton-container-on-an-instance patterns (which is a great one for deployment regardless of your approach).

To that end, yes, their servers are probably hand-rolled or provisioned with minimal scripting like Ansible. And so manual secret deployment is to be expected.

If somebody is attempting to autoscale without having this solved already, they are making mistakes.


“Bloggable” LOL




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: