Absolutely true, but I'm just trying to point out that there are more things that can go wrong than you seem to be covering. You said:
> barrkel: I could flesh it out, but I think there's enough in my comment to get all the way for anyone interested.
I'm letting you know that this turns out not to be the case, for I am interested, and I've read your comment in detail, and for me, there isn't enough there to get all the way.
But you're right that it's not your job to convince me of anything, I'm just trying to let you know that, in my opinion, for what it's worth, you haven't solved the challenge.
> barrkel: I could flesh it out, but I think there's enough in my comment to get all the way for anyone interested.
I'm letting you know that this turns out not to be the case, for I am interested, and I've read your comment in detail, and for me, there isn't enough there to get all the way.
But you're right that it's not your job to convince me of anything, I'm just trying to let you know that, in my opinion, for what it's worth, you haven't solved the challenge.