Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The question was not whether or not an employer should continue to pay a person.

The question was whether or not some angry internet person should be responsible for the livelihood of a developer of a product they are having difficulty with.




Oh, so it'd be ok if the "angry internet person" hust happened to be the PM's boss, noticed this abomination & fired them?

Indeed, if more "angry internet people" (with good clear points like this one) actually provoked performance reviews, we might have better software.

Quit the sophistry. The guy had a real point and you're merely trying to make distracting noise.


Your skewed view of my words led you to a strange end point.

Ill quit the sophistry when you stick to arguments that make sense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: