Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> So I'm a little curious why an article on monitoring compliance digitally only talks to patients who are very very unlikely to be noncompliant.

Noncompliance is a huge problem with schizophrenia. I'm not sure why you'd think otherwise. Something around 50% of medicated schizophrenics go off their meds. Google <schizophrenia noncompliance>.




Well, maybe ~50% of medicated schizophrenics consider the side effects to be worse than the disorder.

Keeping crazies drugged so they don't bother their caregivers is pretty far down the slope, in my opinion.


Is that really the best reason you can think of to treat schizophrenia? I'd think "so they don't harm themselves or others" might rate a bit higher, just for one example.


Well, harming themselves is pretty much OK.

Harming others isn't OK, of course. But drugging people isn't an acceptable solution. It's prone to overuse and abuse.


> Well, harming themselves is pretty much OK.

Oh. You're trolling.

Sorry for wasting my time.


I am not trolling!

I stand firmly for the non-aggression principle. There's no violence against others in self-harm and suicide. And unrequested intervention is aggression.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: