Had I read an article opening with the sentence: «Here is a .NET runtime alternative which is however 100 times slower…», I would have quickly dismissed it, shame on me. This article is right, the DotNetAnywhere code really seems a gem, well worth to study!
> Had I read an article opening with the sentence: «Here is a .NET runtime alternative which is however 100 times slower…», I would have quickly dismissed it
I deliberately didn't start with Benchmarks, pretty much for that reason! Plus I put a huge caveat in before I showed the results.
> This article is right, the DotNetAnywhere code really seems a gem, well worth to study!
Glad you think so as well, that's exactly the reason that I wrote about it. It's relatively unknown and if nothing else it's a really useful resource (whether it's suitable for production is another matter)
