This is a maintenance release. The following items were fixed and/or added:
* GUI: translation updates
* GUI: Fixed double mouse cursor when using mouse integration without Guest Additions, actually a Qt 5.6 bug fixed with QT 5.6.3 (Mac OS X hosts only; bug #15610)
* Solaris hosts: allow increasing MTU size for host-only adapter to 9706 bytes to support jumbo frames
* Linux hosts: glibc 2.26 compile fix
* Windows Additions: 3D related crash fix (bugs #17082, #17092)
I used to use VirtualBox on a Linux, but these days I've migrated to KVM/Qemu[0] + Virt-Manager[1]. It's much nicer to use native Linux virtual machine and not have to worry about kernel modules and proprietary licenses.
That said, the UI polish isn't as nice or intuitive as VirtualBox.
Virtualbox is my go to on Windows. I have used VMware workstation but didn't see any advantage other than the availability of proper support for small businesses or individuals.
Why do people use VMware workstation over virtualbox?
VirtualBox shared folders are really really terrible.
With VMware Workstation that feature is super fast. The product has a much better experience overall.
Unfortunately, I didn't have much luck with Vagrant's VMware plugin (paid) and couldn't realistic make the switch.
It seems using each OS's native virtualization (Hyper-V, xhyve, KVM) is the way to go, but that means we have to maintain separate vagrant boxes, which we don't have to with VMware/VirtualBox since they work on Linux/OSX/Windows.
VMware Workstation is a type 2 hypervisor. You can install and share your VMs with remote users (give them console access). This functionality is free (you don't need a Workstation license) and you don't need add-ons.
I have played with both of the alternate solutions you have shared. These are not perfect, unlike what VMware Workstation provides (as it has, for long period of time).
Presumably because a lot of readers here use vagrant for development environments and may be interested in hearing about a particular bugfix in this release. That's why I clicked at least...
Sure it is, I love it and use it every day... but seeing something like this on the HN homepage makes me think something has happened I really need to know about.
The way it works is someone posts a link. If enough people for whatever reasons of their own decide to upvote that link, it makes it to the front page.
There's never any one justification or reason why something gets voted up. Everyone has their own reasons. One person may upvote because they find it interesting, another because they like it, another because they agree with it, another because they think it's important, another because they want others to know about it, etc. It's a never-ending popularity contest.
Software releases get posted here pretty regularly, and if they're popular enough or interesting enough to the segment of HN readership that happens to be online at the time they get voted up. Period. No explanations given or required.
This is a maintenance release. The following items were fixed and/or added:
* GUI: translation updates
* GUI: Fixed double mouse cursor when using mouse integration without Guest Additions, actually a Qt 5.6 bug fixed with QT 5.6.3 (Mac OS X hosts only; bug #15610)
* Solaris hosts: allow increasing MTU size for host-only adapter to 9706 bytes to support jumbo frames
* Linux hosts: glibc 2.26 compile fix
* Windows Additions: 3D related crash fix (bugs #17082, #17092)