Indeed, the more closely I try to read the article, the less comprehensible it is. Notice a lot of HN commentators using the article title to jump on their soapbox, and nobody trying to engage the substance of the article, which is utterly lacking.
Here's the article's conclusion:
"The emissions targets of cities and the C-40 climate leadership network promoting it — as well as YIMBYcon, an international group of grassroots city developers that operates through groups in Facebook and organises events — provide good examples of such inter-city policies and discussions. The YIMBYcon network shares international examples of city development and prepares concrete shadow plans."
My takeaway is that AI is getting better at writing gibberish.
Here's the article's conclusion: "The emissions targets of cities and the C-40 climate leadership network promoting it — as well as YIMBYcon, an international group of grassroots city developers that operates through groups in Facebook and organises events — provide good examples of such inter-city policies and discussions. The YIMBYcon network shares international examples of city development and prepares concrete shadow plans."
My takeaway is that AI is getting better at writing gibberish.