> Where does your ownership of the land originate if not from someone at some point in history using the threat of violence to keep other people off of it?
It comes from exactly that, and the system in which that occurred was not a free market.
> it was imposed on me with the threat of violence.
Absolutely, _the system_ is imposed with the threat of violence. I said that transactions within the system must be voluntary.
That's an awfully convenient choice of what can regulated and what can't be regulated. Regulations can be imposed to regulate what 7.4 billion people can do with a piece of land, but applying them to one additional person is beyond the pale?
It comes from exactly that, and the system in which that occurred was not a free market.
> it was imposed on me with the threat of violence.
Absolutely, _the system_ is imposed with the threat of violence. I said that transactions within the system must be voluntary.