Buried inside C++ there are some good languages; Which one you would use? take one and leave the other stuffs out.
The problems is that you usually target a subset of C++, and two different company targets different subsets. This produce fragmentation and is not good.
Can this be solved/simplified? ages ago someone proposed an embedded C++ standard, and we have compilers in the embedded fields that support this stardard.
Why it does not succeeds? everybody wanted a different subset of C++.
The problems is that you usually target a subset of C++, and two different company targets different subsets. This produce fragmentation and is not good.
Can this be solved/simplified? ages ago someone proposed an embedded C++ standard, and we have compilers in the embedded fields that support this stardard. Why it does not succeeds? everybody wanted a different subset of C++.