Dayton tops the list for least natural disaster prone. Similar with Southern Maryland. Denver is pretty high on the list and Seattle seems pretty safe too.
There are plenty of places to go.
For some reason we seem to love to build massive cities on disaster areas. I'm looking at you SF, LA and NYC.
But hey fuck it, lets just continue being bad at statistics and assume that because a natural disaster happened recently it won't happen again for a long time (the idea of a "500 year" storm is insane).
If the Yellowstone super volcano erupts, it doesn't really matter where in the northern hemisphere you live - in fact life on _most_ of the earth's surface is going to suck for a few decades after that.
Seattle has valve nearby. If anyone ever buys some expensive gem and jams it into exotic machinery.. my bet is on these guys. So very dangerous place to live in..
There are plenty of places to go.
For some reason we seem to love to build massive cities on disaster areas. I'm looking at you SF, LA and NYC.
But hey fuck it, lets just continue being bad at statistics and assume that because a natural disaster happened recently it won't happen again for a long time (the idea of a "500 year" storm is insane).
[1]https://www.cbsnews.com/media/top-10-safest-us-cities-from-n...