I wasn't saying their conclusions are automatically wrong, but merely pointing out that this one requires a little bit more scrutiny given the obvious political leanings.
It's like reading a science paper that questions something with a ton of evidence behind it. You just have to ask "really?" of all their claims before accepting it or rejecting it.
It's like reading a science paper that questions something with a ton of evidence behind it. You just have to ask "really?" of all their claims before accepting it or rejecting it.