Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The system is fundamentally 6^N dimensional with N~10^23.



I suppose you meant 6*N? Which is a lot better, but still intractable. And anyway, we don't exactly resolve molecules in e.g. turbulent flow simulations, yet they still take tens, even hundreds of millions of CPU-hours.


6*N, yes. Pretty bad mistake there. But yes, even if you don't model every particle and restrict yourself to "parcels" of fluid like in most simulations, you still have a very difficult problem.


Okay, this is really showing my ignorance but why 6?

You start off with 4 (3 space plus one time (ignoring 11-dimensional space-time)) and add which dimensions exactly? Can the individual interactions between wave/particles be reduced to 2 dimensions? Aren't they going to interact along the whole range of forces they exert: gravitational, weak, electromagnetic, strong?


3 dimensions for position + 3 dimensions for speed


3 dimensions for momentum in other words? Surely it cannot be that simple. That's astounding.


Unless you consider quantum effects, which are probably relevant in this situation, then it's an exponentially larger problem space.


Yeah, 6^N dimensions are fun! ;)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: