right, and releasing the source code is giving a map to criminals to allow them to hack it.
The "no security through obscurity" theory is not entirely true in the real world.
When you push up the cost (money and skill) of a hack then hackers will attack weaker components and so the likelihood of a hack is smaller.
This code is highly secure and would require an enormous amount of specialist knowledge, equipment, and time to extract, analyze and exploit.
The effort involved rules out rational profit motivated individuals because the costs are too high and there are plentiful opportunities for lower cost exploits.
No company releases the source for their DRM code except to legitimately interested parties in controlled circumstances and that is the correct policy from a security perspective.
The "no security through obscurity" theory is not entirely true in the real world.
When you push up the cost (money and skill) of a hack then hackers will attack weaker components and so the likelihood of a hack is smaller.
This code is highly secure and would require an enormous amount of specialist knowledge, equipment, and time to extract, analyze and exploit.
The effort involved rules out rational profit motivated individuals because the costs are too high and there are plentiful opportunities for lower cost exploits.
No company releases the source for their DRM code except to legitimately interested parties in controlled circumstances and that is the correct policy from a security perspective.