Your statement seems like a 'first out of the gate', or 'battle tested' argument. They are approximately the same age, no?
They aren't competing technologies; they have differing use cases.
One has enjoyed wide success, and the other is still stumbling along.
Is it a case of unclear standards, bad implementations, or lack of interest in the blue-tooth use case of wireless accessory devices?
Your statement seems like a 'first out of the gate', or 'battle tested' argument. They are approximately the same age, no?
They aren't competing technologies; they have differing use cases.
One has enjoyed wide success, and the other is still stumbling along.
Is it a case of unclear standards, bad implementations, or lack of interest in the blue-tooth use case of wireless accessory devices?