Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Agreed that it's unfair to call it a failure. GoPro is what most people think of when you suggest filming something sports-related. They made a product which does what it says it does, and has become a very recognizable brand for action filming. Nothing lasts forever, I'd mark their efforts a success.



Why buy a gopro when a $100 china commodity clone will do good enough?

The sensors & lenses are going to be the same size, from sony and rubber gaskets with a hard plastic shell is not hard to do.


What does this have to do with classifying them as a success or failure?

But while we're on your topic, don't forget there is value in brand recognition and trust in a company which isn't a random Chinese vendor. And why do you think the Chinese clones exist at all? They followed the success of GoPro.


Why would you buy an iphone if any cheap $100 android phone will do good enough?


For enough people a premium iphone is worth the wait xtra cost, which is why Apples smartphone profits are greater than all other smartphone makers combined.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: