Would a.mult(b) be terrible for the first example?
I assume the third example is R-style:
df[df['foo'] < 10 ] ?
foo = make_df()[foo['col'] > 10]
df.filt(lambda x: x > 10, ['foo'])
df.filt(lambda x, y: (x > 10) and (y > 10), ['foo', 'bar']) new_tbl = make_df().filt(lambda x, y: (x > 10) and (y > 10), ['foo', 'bar'])
df[(df['foo'] < 10) & (df['bar'] < 10)]
Would a.mult(b) be terrible for the first example?
I assume the third example is R-style:
I don't believe I can ovveride 'is', or 'instanceof', plus df has to pre-exist: why does it have to be R-style? is that necessarily more powerful than something more pythonic? or even vs also, I believe James Powell does a talk wrt the inconsistencies of pandas/numpy interface.